Thursday, December 31, 2009

Gore: Carbon Polluters Like Big Tobacco

(CBS) This month, a poll of 3,000 Americans showed 49 percent were not that worried about global warming. That's up from 39 percent in 2007, when Al Gore's book and documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" was the hot topic in the climate change debate.

So, does the political will to save the planet from the potential harm from global warming still exist in the U.S.?

According to Gore, who has authored a new book called "Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis," the movement is rising -- not only in the U.S. but also around the world -- with people determined to solve the crisis.

"Early Show" co-anchor Harry Smith recently sat down with Gore and asked him about the environmental debate as we head into a new decade.

In the U.S., while there is more scientific agreement, there seems to be less political agreement about global warming. How does Gore view this disparity?

Gore told Smith, "Some of the largest carbon polluters have been vigorous and try to convince people -- as the tobacco industry did years ago on the link between smoking cigarettes and lung disease -- that there really isn't a link -- between global warming -- pollution and global warming. But the power of that kind of lobbying and advertising does have an impact."

Some climate models, Smith noted, say it takes a certain number of years for the environment to recover -- even if you stopped pouring carbon into the atmosphere now. So is it too late?

Gore said it's not too late, but added, "Some of the consequences are going to play out because we've already increased temperature one degree and another degree is stored up in the oceans. But the truly catastrophic effects that these scientists have been telling us we've got to stop, can still be avoided."

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Secretary-General confers with world leaders on climate change

Secretary-General confers with world leaders on climate change

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on a trip to the Polar Ice Rim to see the effects of climate change firsthand. [File Photo]

30 December 2009 – Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has been speaking to numerous world leaders on the heels of the historic United Nations conference in Copenhagen which recently wrapped up with nations reaching a political agreement on climate change.

Following the summit’s end less than two weeks ago, Mr. Ban has made calls to leaders from countries such as China, the United States, Ethiopia, the Maldives, Grenada, France, Brazil and Australia.

The Copenhagen Accord was struck in the Danish capital on 19 December after the Secretary-General intervened at the last minute to assuage nations that felt they had been excluded from parts of the negotiations.

It aims to jump-start immediate action on climate change and guide negotiations on long-term action. It also includes an agreement to working towards curbing global temperature rise to below 2 degrees Celsius, efforts to reduce or limit emissions, and pledges to mobilize $100 billion a year for developing countries to combat climate change.

“While I am satisfied that we sealed a deal, I am aware that the outcome of the Copenhagen conference, including the Copenhagen Accord, did not go as far as many have hoped,” Mr. Ban told reporters after returning to New York from Denmark.

The two-week-long UN conference in Copenhagen, attended by more than 100 heads of State and government, was marked by interruptions in negotiations due to divisions between States over transparency and other issues.

“The leaders were united in purpose, but they were not united in action,” Mr. Ban pointed out, exhorting world leaders to act in concert to ensure that a legally binding treaty is reached next year.

Nonetheless, he said that the talks “represent a beginning – an essential beginning,” because without nations hammering out a deal in Copenhagen, the financial and technical support for poorer nations agreed upon would not take immediate effect.

News Tracker: past stories on this issue

United action on global scale needed to clinch new climate pact, says Ban

via un.org

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Facing climate change, developing world benefits from UN online scientific scheme

Facing climate change, developing world benefits from UN online scientific scheme

30 December 2009 – As part of a project to promote scientific knowledge in the developing world in the face of climate change, the United National environmental agency this month extended its online programme to Yemen, offering it a chance to gain greater access to leading scientific journals.

Yemen is now one of 108 developing countries which have free access to the latest in scientific literature through the Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE) project of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP).

UNEP, Yemen’s Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and the Ministry of Water and Environment worked together with the UN World Health Organization (WHO) to train 30 Yemeni researchers, scientists, planers, and lecturers about the use of OARE to support the country as it faces increasing environmental challenges due to climate change, food crisis and water scarcity.

Yemen’s economy depends largely on the oil and fishing industries. Even though recent reports show a 25 per cent increase in fish product exports and a 30 per cent increase in fish volume, according to a recent World Bank report, the country is facing an alarming decline in fish stock and production in some areas.

“We need to do much more to get to a climate-smart world,” Katherine Sierra, Vice-President for Sustainable Development at the World Bank, said. “On the energy front, we must tackle difficult issues like technology transfer, investment, and climate finance. But when it comes to adaptation and building climate resilience, the challenge is more complex and the role of knowledge will be key.”

So far, more than 1,600 institutions are registered with OARE to use the wide collection of scientific research and the increasing number of scientific databases and portals. OARE's expanding role in developing countries comes at a time when the world is focusing on knowledge and technology transfer to promote more sustainable development. Access to the latest findings in environmental science will help those countries adapt to an increasingly changing environment.

In November, a similar workshop was organized in Amman, Jordan, where 35 Jordanian and Iraqi participants were trained. Other trainings are scheduled for Tunisia, Morocco and Afghanistan in early 2010.

The crucial transfer of scientific information to the developing world began two years ago when UNEP negotiated a deal with leading publishers to build one of the largest electronic collections of scientific knowledge in environmental and related areas, in partnership with WHO, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Yale and Cornell universities in the United States, international publishers, and private sector groups like Microsoft.

The result is a collection that is available online and contains more than 2,900 scientific and peer-reviewed journals with a value of around $1.5 million a year.

News Tracker: past stories on this issue

Climate change deal marks an 'essential beginning,' Ban says

via un.org

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Top 5 Reasons to Be Hopeful About 2010

Despite the epic failure of the UN climate summit in Copenhagen, I think there are plenty of reasons to be hopeful that 2010 will be a banner year for achieving new and lasting environmental protection. Here are the top 5 reasons why:

5.) The EPA’s official “endangerment finding” on greenhouse gases — the determination that they pose a threat to human health and welfare — obligates the agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. This gives us another tool with which to combat global warming. The climate bill passed by the House of Representatives would actually strip this regulatory capacity from the EPA, however, while the Senate bill so far does not. But still, I think the endangerment finding is a very positive step, as it puts pressure on both houses of Congress to take action, and gives us a fallback option should Congress fail to act.

4.) The call for action is growing louder every day. About halfway through the Copenhagen climate summit, for instance, the global coalition Tcktcktck.org hit the 15 million calls for climate action mark. There are now well over 15 million “Global Citizens for Climate Action” counted by the site. People from all over the globe are realizing that climate change is the greatest threat we face, and are committed to doing something about it. These types of numbers cannot be ignored for long.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

The great betrayal at Copenhagen

By sealing the so-called Copenhagen Accord [ Images ] with the United States, the BASIC grouping (Brazil [ Images ], South Africa [ Images ], India and China) has mocked at the multilateral negotiations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), destroyed the unity of the developing-countries bloc, the Group of 77 + China, and paved the way for accelerated global climate change.

The BASIC countries had pledged to rescue the climate talks from the machinations of those developed countries which are bent on avoiding their climate-related obligations. Instead of using its clout to press them to do so, BASIC colluded with some of them.

The Copenhagen Accord is a shady, stealthily executed backroom deal between these five countries and was extended to only 26 of the 193 countries represented at Copenhagen. It was principally driven by the United States and China, with India's complicity.

Contrary to propaganda, the Accord isn't a 'win-win' deal, an honourable compromise, or a first step to a better deal. It runs against the imperative of an ambitious, effective, equitable and legally binding agreement, which the world desperately needs to fight climate change. It's deeply iniquitous because it will increase the disproportionate burden that climate change already imposes upon the world's poor people. It thus represents a disaster for the vast majority of Indians.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Obama's arrival expected to inject fresh momentum into Copenhagen talks

* Environment
* Copenhagen climate change conference 2009

Copenhagen climate conference
Obama's arrival expected to inject fresh momentum into Copenhagen talks

US president said to be preparing 'knock out punch' after Hillary Clinton's gamechanging promise to back $100bn climate aid

*
Comments (11)
* Buzz up!
* Digg it

* Suzanne Goldenberg in Copenhagen
* guardian.co.uk, Thursday 17 December 2009 19.38 GMT
* Article history

Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office

Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office earlier this year - the US secretary of state soothed tensions before the US president's arrival for the final day of talks in Copenhagen. Photograph: Pete Souza/White House/HO/EPA

Barack Obama is poised to arrive in Copenhagen tomorrow with additional pledges of cash for poor countries which will suffer the most from global warming, a day after America's promise to support a $100bn a year climate fund.

Obama's arrival has been the most anticipated event of the 10-day summit, which has lurched between optimism and rank despair. He will seek to make a decisive impact, building on the announcement today by Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, who said for the first time that America would support a $100bn global climate change fund from 2020. But she will be a tough act to follow, as the statement was seen by delegates as a gamechanger.

Obama is expected to add an extra boost of momentum by beefing up America's share in a $10bn a year fast-track aid package. That aims to cushion poor countries from the impact of climate change and promote rainforest preservation starting next year. He is also expected to outline little-known provisions in the climate bill passed by the House of Representatives that would direct some $4bn a year from the auction of emission allowances to a fund to help developing countries adapt to climate change and deploy clean technology.

He is also expected to call more forcefully on the Senate to pass climate change law, critical to the eventual success of Copenhagen. "I've got a sense that she set the table, and he is going to deliver the knock-out punch," said Earl Blumenauer, part of the delegation of Democratic congressmen to the talks.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Leaked UN document shows deal could still lead to catastrophic global warming

The document is an internal briefing paper drawn up by the UN Framework Committee on Climate Change that is in charge of the talks.

It says that even the most ambitious emission reduction targets currently offered by developed and developing countries, including the EU and US, would set the world on course for warming of around 5.4F (3C).

This could cause a rise in sea levels, droughts, floods and mass extinction of species.

Kumi Naidoo, the executive director of Greenpeace International, said the document is a “smoking gun” that puts pressure on world leaders to increase targets on cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

“This is the single most important piece of paper in the world today. It shows in stark terms that the climate deal on the table in Copenhagen would put at risk the very viability of our civilisation on Earth. A three degree rise in temperatures means devastation for Africa and the possible collapse of the eco-systems that billions of humans rely on,” he said.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

U.S. pledge, signal from China spur hope for climate deal

Reporting from Copenhagen - Overnight gloom at international climate negotiations here has given way to cautious afternoon optimism, with delegates and observers expressing hope today that world leaders are moving toward clearing several key roadblocks to a new agreement to limit greenhouse gases.

Two moves revived the talks, which appeared this morning to be dangerously close to flat-lining.

The Obama administration announced that it would join allies in raising $100 billion by 2020 to help the world's poorest countries adapt to climate change, a number that stunned many environmentalists with its size -- and which appears to meet the top demand of China, whose stalemate with the United States had bogged down the negotiations.

In response, China signaled it was moving toward satisfying the top American demand: that developing nations such as China and India will limit their greenhouse gas emissions as their economies grow, and that those limits must be subject to some form of outside verification.

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei told reporters in a news conference that China is open to "dialogue and cooperation that is not intrusive, that does not infringe on China's sovereignty" -- a major linguistic departure from the country's staunch opposition to transparency measures throughout the talks so far.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Clinton Pledges Support to End Deforestation as Brazil Leads the Way in Copenhagen

Canada has emerged as a serious climate criminal in the last two weeks in Copenhagen by weakening its pledged emissions cuts. But Brazil has emerged as potential climate heroes in their determination to both cut emissions, cut deforestation, and use 10 per cent of an oil exploration fund to invest in climate change adaption.

Of course, oil exploration, drilling and burning will continue in Brazil but by supporting sustainable production chains, developing policy to reduce carbon emissions, and further supporting "scientific analysis of impacts and vulnerabilities," hopefully Brazil's Climate Fund will make the precise impact of climate change in Brazil even more clear, and further encourage politicians to act to cut emissions, even more steeply than the 40 per cent below business-as-usual rates by 2020. Norway, for the record, is pledging carbon neutrality by 2030.

No matter what happens in Copenhagen, cutting deforestation is essential: the rainforests are the lungs of the world, and replacing the land with carbon-intensive farming, agriculture, and soy or meat production is even worse. Today in Copenhagen Hilary Clinton proposed an international fund of $100 billion each year for a decade to preserve rainforests and help the world's most vulnerable people cope with the effects of climate change.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Futuristic bike wheel and iPhone app set to fight pollution, climate change

The Copenhagen Wheel is a bike wheel with a "Swiss army knife's worth of electronic gadgets," designed by researchers at MIT's Senseable City Lab.

The Copenhagen Wheel is one of many initiatives created to help the city of Copenhagen achieve its goal of becoming the first carbon neutral capital in the world by 2025.

The wheel was presented to government officials at the Copenhagen Conference on Climate Change on December 15, 2009.

The Copenhagen Wheel transforms ordinary bikes into hybrid e-bikes that can provide their rider with an extra power boost in the tough parts of their ride. Energy from braking is stored inside the purposely designed batteries housed inside the wheel, ready to be expended on the next uphill climb.

"The wheel uses a technology similar to the KERS (Kinetic Energy Recovery System), which has radically changed Formula One racing over the past couple of years. When you brake, your kinetic energy is recuperated by an electric motor and then stored by batteries within the wheel, so that you can have it back to you when you need it," explained professor Carlo Ratti, director of the MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Senseable City Lab.

Combined with a specially designed iPhone application, the Copenhagen Wheel uses its inbuilt sensors and Bluetooth connection to track your ride from A to B.

The smartphone application keeps detailed information about the bicycle's speed, direction and distance travelled. As the person rides, sensors also collect information about the amount of pollution in the air and can tell the rider if their friends are nearby.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Obama heads to Copenhagen, sees progress with China | Reuters

Obama leaves Washington later on Thursday and is expected to arrive in Denmark around 8 a.m. local time on Friday, U.S. officials told reporters on a conference call.

He will give a brief address at a plenary session with other world leaders and emphasize the renewed U.S. commitment to show leadership on global warming, but he is not expected to be more specific about Washington's pledge to help provide funding for poor countries dealing with climate change.

That pledge is tied to monitoring, reporting and verification requirements by China and other big developing countries on their emissions curbs. China has resisted such requirements.

One U.S. official said progress was being made on that issue and others ahead of Obama's arrival.

"We're making progress on all of our outstanding issues with the Chinese. We have a good dialogue going and there are other parties as well," the official said.

"There's still a way to go on all the issues and there's not much time left, so we certainly can't predict at this point what the outcome of the conference will be," he said.

Obama, who delayed a decision on whether to attend the talks until just weeks ago, is staking his credibility on the still elusive deal with ramifications for him at home and on the world stage.

Asked whether the president was concerned about returning empty-handed from Copenhagen for a second time this year after failing to secure the 2016 Olympics for Chicago, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said, "Coming back with an empty agreement would be far worse than coming back empty-handed."

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Most throw cold water on China warming theory

Reporting from Beijing - In the debate over global warming, some historical meteorologists in China pose a contrarian view.

Their theory, in a nutshell? Some like it hot.

Looking back over the millenniums, these scientists suggest that China has prospered during periods when temperatures are higher than usual. Conversely, they point out, cold spells have accompanied tragedies along the order of barbarian invasions, collapsing dynasties and civil war.

The proposition that global warming might actually be good for China, or at least a mixed blessing, has been quietly discussed -- and largely dismissed -- in academic circles here.

Those who see possible good in global warming for China rarely speak about it publicly, fearing that they will be seen as being out of step with the scientific mainstream.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

97% of Climate Scientists Agree: Humans are Causing Global Warming

Despite Reporting Results, CNN Ignores Its Own Memo.

The results of an important survey of 3,145 scientists, are crystal clear: the vast majority of the scientific community believes humans are responsible for a warming climate. A full 90% of all scientists surveyed believe global warming is occurring, and 82% believe it is because of the actions of man. And a whopping 97% of climatologists surveyed said humans are causing global warming. But that didn't stop CNN from ignoring its own articles and running a misleading 'climate debate' TV segment despite its reports on the scientific consensus.

This is extremely important information at this crucial time. With results of Copenhagen uncertain, the fate of the energy reform bill in the Senate uncertain, and the recent debacle over hacked climate emails giving deniers an (unfounded) excuse to make noise, the results of this survey, which was covered by CNN online should help send a clear message about the scientific stance on climate change.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Obama heads to U.N. climate change talks in Copenhagen

If getting 60 senators to agree on health care is tough, try persuading 193 countries to agree on anything.

That's the task that awaits President Obama when he arrives Friday in Copenhagen to try to salvage a worldwide pact to address global warming. Nine days of negotiations have so far failed to bridge the gap among rich and poor countries on a wide range of economic and political issues, and even some of Obama's supporters say they have lowered their expectations.

"I don't think the president can completely close this deal (Friday)," Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat and vice chairwoman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, said by telephone from Copenhagen.

The United Nations-run conference has brought more than 20,000 government officials, environmental activists, scientists and others under one roof to try to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that scientific data suggest are causing the earth to warm.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Al Gore rallies the troops in Copenhagen

Al Gore took full advantage of his stature among fellow environmentalists to dish out some hard home truths today – and try to prod the climate change summit towards a deal.

The former US vice-president, though among friends, was unsparing. He turned up the pressure on Barack Obama, calling on activists to press the White House and the Senate to pass a climate change law by the 30th anniversary of Earth day in late April.

"Join me in asking president Obama and the US Senate to set a deadline of 22 April for final action in the US Senate," he said. "I do not believe we can wait till next November or December."

The ultimatum to Obama was a departure for Gore who has been cautious of exerting too much pressure on the president, or causing him embarrassment.

He kept up the pace by calling for the international community to sign up to a fully fledged climate change treaty by July 2010 – and then announcing that Mexico was prepared to host a deal-making summit.

He scolded rich countries for demanding the developing world offer evidence of emissions cuts while at the same time trying to inflate the funds they were prepared to offer poor countries to deal with climate change. "This issue of transparency should also be applied to financial pledges of developed countries," he said. "How many times has same money been pledged two, three or even four times?"

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Hillary Clinton joins Copenhagen climate change conference

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will travel to Copenhagen for the conference on climate change on Thursday. The Obama administration has decided to double down late in the game as the talks have come to a stand still, Secretary of State Clinton with vast experience on the world stage will enter the fray this week. Clinton is a well known figure in international circles and she will attend the meetings in hopes of putting together some type of agreement with developing countries.

She will hold meetings at the conference on Thursday and then join the Obama administration team due to arrive on December 18th.

The divide between rich and poor countries is one of the key fissures at the United Nations conference on climate change in Denmark.

Clinton has said that developing countries must try harder to come to an agreement on climate change.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

BBC News - Climate change summit leaves sceptical Russia cold

As President Dmitry Medvedev prepares to join talks to save the planet in Copenhagen, only a minority of Russians will be worrying much about the outcome.

Climate change and the environment are not big issues for most Russians - and most of the time the government seems equally unconcerned.

"Global warming, the Kyoto Protocol, cutting emissions, nuclear waste, incinerators - it might be a topic of discussion among Moscow's business elite, but the masses are nowhere near these issues. No-one's talking about them," said former Russian deputy prime minister Boris Nemtsov, an outspoken critic of the current Russian government.

"There is one popular opinion, though - that Russia is a cold country and warming it up slightly wouldn't do any harm."

Russia has pledged to ensure that greenhouse gas emissions in 2020 are at least 25% below 1990 levels.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

U.N.: Climate deal could change history

(CNN) -- U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Tuesday urged both industrialized and developing countries to do more during this week's Copenhagen summit toward reaching an agreement on limiting carbon emissions.

With world leaders gathering in hopes of forging a deal to reduce the emissions blamed for increasing global temperatures, Ban told reporters that "Nature does not negotiate with us."

"We have a chance -- a real chance, here and now -- to change the course of our history," he said. But both industrialized and developing countries "can and they must do more."

"This is a time to stop pointing fingers," Ban added. "This is a time to start looking in the mirror and offering what they can do more of."

The divide between rich and poor countries is one of the key fissures at the U.N. climate change conference that is nearing a climax in Denmark. Developing countries object to restrictions which they fear would keep them from following the same path to prosperity that the United States and other industrialized nations took, while developed countries are wary of taking steps that would hinder their own economies.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Nature won't 'negotiate' over climate change, Ban warns talks

COPENHAGEN — Tensions at international climate talks here rose a notch on Tuesday as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warned an assembly that the outcome of a worldwide climate pact years in the making will be determined during the next three days.

"We have a chance, a real chance, to change the course of our history," Ban said in a speech in the main plenary hall. "We do not have another year to deliberate. Nature does not negotiate with us."

Tuesday saw the arrival of such heads of state as Prime Minister Gordon Brown of the United Kingdom and President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe who will be joined by 60 more of their peers on Wednesday. Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama will arrive later in the week.

In the meantime, already-weary negotiators will be working alongside environment ministers through the remaining days and nights to find a deal on which world leaders can agree.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Royal Society statement on climate change

The world's nations are gathering in Copenhagen in an attempt to reach agreement over how to prevent dangerous interference with the climate, the stated aim of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

There is no such thing as 'safe' climate change. Even the global temperature increase to date (about 0.75˚C) is contributing to effects that are impossible to adapt to in some regions, notably small low-lying islands and coastal areas. As the temperature rises further, so will the risk of more widespread and dangerous climate impacts; from sea level rise, from increasing frequency and intensity of climate extremes such as heat waves, floods and droughts, especially in vulnerable areas.

A maximum global temperature increase of 2˚C since pre-industrial times has been adopted by many nations as a goal to prevent dangerous climate change. If global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are reduced at 3 - 4% per year after 2020,it has been estimated that there is a fifty-fifty chance of limiting global temperature increase to roughly 2°C;but only if GHG emissions begin to decline within the next decade. By 2050, emissions would need to be down to near 50% of their 1990 levels, with continuing reductions in the second half of this century.

It is not only the rate of GHG emissions that matters, but also their accumulation over time, particularly for the long-lived gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2). Once our actions have raised concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere, levels will remain elevated for more than a thousand years. The crucial role played by the cumulative emissions of CO2 means that the later global emissions peak, the more rapid the eventual decline would have to be, which would likely cause economic and social disruption across the globe.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Former Vice President Al Gore Speaks on Climate Change

Former United States Vice President Al Gore urged world leaders at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Tuesday to speed up a binding deal on climate change.

Instead of finishing up work with a treaty in Mexico City in a year, Gore
proposed a final meeting and treaty agreement in July 2010, saying he was sure that Mexico would go along with the new schedule.


give momentum to this process, make it a success and set the stage for the completion of a binding international treaty next year," he said, speaking at the talks in the Danish capital.

Gore also urged the US Congress to come up with its climate legislation by April 22, the 40th anniversary of Earth Day.

In a pep-talk to climate negotiators, he suggested that verifying emission cuts, which the US wants, should be married to transparency in financial aid pledges, which poorer countries want.

"We can do it, we must do it, and as I have said many times, I believe that political will is a renewable resource," the Nobel Peace Prize winner said.

Gore won the accolade for his efforts at climate change.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Schwarzenegger blasts Palin's take on global warming

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger took the stagein Copenhagen today to deliver his speech on combating climate change, but he also created buzz with a series of shots at 2008 GOP VP nominee Sarah Palin's global warming skepticism.

"You have to ask: what was she trying to accomplish?" he told the Financial Times. "Is she really interested in this subject or is she interested in her career and in winning the [Republican] nomination [for president]? You have to take all these things with a grain of salt."

On ABC's "Good Morning America," he dismissed Palin's calls for President Obama to boycott the climate talks.

"I think there are people that just don't believe in fixing and working on the environment. They don't believe there is such a thing as global warming, they're still living in the Stone Age, which is OK, we need people like that, too," he said.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Before your very ice: glacial evidence of global warming

Rathong Glacier, West Sikkim, India // Breathing heavily in the thin Himalayan air, Shresth Tayal pauses for a moment on the steep mountain track and gestures with his walking stick towards the Rathong glacier, nestling like a pearl between two jagged peaks on the skyline.

Then, with a sweep of his stick, he points down beneath him to a wide, silver scar running along the brown-green floor of the Rathong Valley in India’s north-eastern state of Sikkim.

“That’s where the glacier used to be,” he said, tracing the length of the pale, rubbly corridor with his cane. “Last year it was in a much better state.”

Up close, the glacier reveals further signs of deterioration. The sound of running water burbles up from hollows in its core and at its snout (the technical name for a glacier’s lowest point) a lake has formed.

For Mr Tayal, this is all evidence of one thing: that climate change is causing the Himalayan glaciers – the largest store of fresh water in the world after the polar ice caps – to disappear.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Moderate global warming to wipe out many species | Reuters

Ahmed Djoghlaf also told Reuters on the sidelines of December 7-18 talks on climate change in Copenhagen that every nation in the world was set to fail to meet a target of slowing the loss of species by 2010.

The Copenhagen talks are considering adopting a goal of limiting global warming to a 2 degree Celsius rise over pre-industrial times, a target agreed in July by industrialized nations and other leading economies including China and India.

"For each degree centigrade of warmer temperature, it is predicted that 10 percent of all known species will disappear," Djoghlaf told Reuters.

"Therefore this idea of stabilizing the temperature at no more than 2 Celsius...will lead to the disappearance of 20 percent of known species," he said. "Climate change is contributing to the loss of biodiversity."

He said scientists have recorded more than 2 million species, from apples to zebras, but there may be more than 15-30 million. World temperatures have already risen by about 0.7 degrees Celsius since the start of the Industrial Revolution.

"We continue to lose biodiversity at unprecedented rates and this has been seriously compounded by climate change but also by land use, urbanization," and other factors, Djoghlaf said.

A report this week said climate change will disrupt habitats for many creatures other than polar bears whose Arctic home is thawing.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Friday, December 11, 2009

Aiming for a Deal on Climate Change

In Copenhagen, Denmark, the United Nations Climate Change Conference opened this week. Around fifteen thousand delegates and observers from nearly two hundred countries are there. Some call it "the last best chance" for an agreement to fight climate change.

Yvo de Boer is the top climate official at the United Nations.

YVO DE BOER: "The time for formal statements is over. The time for restating well known positions is past. The time has come to reach out to each other. I urge you to build on your achievements, take up the work that has already been done and turn it into real action."

But there are questions about how much can be done, and how an agreement would be put into action.

The twelve-day conference ends next Friday. Late next week, leaders from more than one hundred countries are expected at the talks, including President Obama.

Delegates hope to set new targets to reduce greenhouse gases -- the pollution blamed for trapping extra heat in the atmosphere. An existing agreement, the Kyoto Protocol, ends in two thousand twelve. Many countries have offered new proposals for cuts, including the United States and China.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

What a Leading Climate Scientist Has to Say

Berkeley climate researcher Inez Fung doesn't really like politics. She's a scientist . But over her distinguished career, she has regularly waded into political battles, like when she contributed to the IPCC work that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 and advised Massachusetts during its successful suit to force the EPA to count CO2 as pollution.

Next week, rather than go to Copenhagen, she will attend the American Geophysical Union's (AGU) annual conference, one of the biggest collection of Earth scientists in the world. Change.org spoke to her on Friday as she hurried to prepare.

Q: So what are you hoping for from the Copenhagen conference?

Inez Fung: What I'm hoping for I don't think will happen. I'm hoping for drastic reduction in emissions and I do not see that in the cards. So now what I'm hoping for is that they give a sense of urgency. To pretend we can do two degrees [conservative estimate for temperature rise] is a pretense. The greenhouse gases that are in the atmosphere have already committed us to over two degrees. The reason [temperatures have not risen] over two degrees is that we are counting on aerosols to offset. But aerosols are bad guys. They are pollution.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

The U.N.'s Ban Ki-Moon on Climate Change and Copenhagen

As the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon has a wealth of global problems he could turn his focus on: genocide, war, HIV. But the South Korean diplomat has chosen to make climate change his number one priority, even hosting a one-day, high-level summit on warming at the UN in New York this September. Now with a momentous climate change summit under way in Copenhagen, Ban's efforts are bearing fruit. He spoke with TIME's Bryan Walsh about his hopes for the conference, the responsibilities of rich and poor nations and why climate change is ultimately a moral issue.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1929071_1929070_1947173,00.html#ixzz0ZQSJKXNs

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Salazar Says Climate Skeptics Wrong; U.S. Will Cap Emissions

Dec. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Climate-change skeptics are wrong and the U.S. will pass a new law capping greenhouse gases as it seeks to compete in the global market for low-emission technologies, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said today.

“Some people don’t even accept that climate change is real,” Salazar said in Copenhagen, where 192 countries are meeting to negotiate a new treaty to combat global warming. “I believe they are wrong. Their fear in my view is misplaced.”

Salazar, a former Democratic senator from Colorado, also said the U.S. Congress will succeed in passing a measure setting limits on carbon-dioxide pollution from power plants, factories and other sources.

“We will pass a comprehensive energy and climate-change legislation in the United States of America,” he said. “We will build a clean-energy future for our country.”

Salazar said it’s important that the U.S. remain competitive in the race to dominate the burgeoning market for low-emissions technologies.

“The U.S. can’t afford to fall behind in the energy technology that will shape” the future, he said.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Video: Climate change in northern China: The evaporating tourist trade

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Video: Nepal is not to blame for this, yet we are the first victims

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Scientists say planet only has 10 years to stop catastrophic global warming

The deadline for going green and and saving the planet from dangerous warming was dramatically spelled out at the Copenhagen climate conference yesterday.

If we are not making drastic cuts in pollution by 2020, costing everybody on the planet up to £150-a-year, we have virtually no chance of limiting temperature rises to 2C.

Only geo-engineering solutions such as covering the planet in artificial trees or reflecting sunlight back into space with mirrors could save us. They are still on the drawing board without any proof they will work

And even the most optimistic deal in Copenhagen might not be enough to save us from dangerous warming above 2C.

Scientists from the Met Office and Hadley Centre have just run 729 emission scenarios through computers and found just how tough reaching the targets will be - even with a climate deal.

Dr Jason Lowe, head of mitigation advice at the Met Office, said: "None of the modelling I have seen has an easy answer to the question of limiting warming to 2C. What this research says is that there are pathways which lead to 2C, the Copenhagen goal, but those pathways appear very challenging in terms of time and rate of emissions reductions.

"The only way you can achieve the 2C target is to peak no later than 2020 and cut emissions by at least 4 per cent every year after that. If you don't manage to do that you will have to turn to geo-engineering.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Global warming hysteria heats up

With the type of breathless hysteria usually reserved for concert promoters and reality show organizers, the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change is underway in Copenhagen.

In an attempt to transfer wealth from rich countries to poor and to eventually wipe out the fossil fuel economy, all in the name of global warming, there's been unprecedented hoopla. And if hyperbole is any measure, we hit some new highs with a couple of guests on my radio show.

Professional environmental organizer Jeh Custer, who is from Saskatoon, phoned from Copenhagen and declared that "climate change is the human rights issue of our generation." He compared it to "slavery, genocide, colonialism, racial segregation and the denying of women and minorities the right to vote." Whew.

We also heard from Guy Dauncy, self-described green activist, author and "sustainable communities consultant" who warned of the collapse of human civilization, wars, planetary chaos, death and disaster from imminent global warming.

The global warming-hype crowd seems to have ratcheted up its fear mongering to red-line levels. Maybe it's to get us really panicked as Copenhagen gets going or it's a desperate Hail Mary pass amid growing revelations from "climate-gate" at East Anglia University's climate research unit, where documents and e-mails suggest someone has been cooking the books on global warming.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Schwarzenegger to take state climate story to Copenhagen

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger plans to carry California's climate change story to a conference in Copenhagen next week, a move that will burnish his international image as a leader in the war on global warming.

He'll also take an entourage of 20 administration officials to Denmark. Three nonprofit organizations are picking up the tab.

Administration officials say the trip and a speech Schwarzenegger will deliver on Tuesday at the United Nations conference will underscore how he has fought a political guerrilla war to cut greenhouse gas emissions – often against naysayers in his own Republican Party – as a state executive acting on what is usually considered a national or international issue.

"This matters because it's the governor following through on his leadership," said Dan Pellissier, Schwarzenegger's deputy secretary for energy and development. "He's established (environmental issues) as a key part of of his tenure."

Schwarzenegger and other state officials will meet with more than 100 international leaders and 15,000 participants at the COP 15 United Nations Climate Change Conference, which started Monday and ends Dec. 18. World leaders have gathered there to work out international agreements to curtail fossil-fuel emissions that many scientists believe are speeding up global warming.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Scientists support global warming data

-->

Tom Creegan's letter to the editor of Nov. 24 prompted me to write this response. In today's political environment and media bias, it's difficult to find the truth, but I believe with global warming we have real data and thoughtful analysis that might surprise you.

American scientists with university degrees totaling 31,486 - including 9,029 Ph.D.s - have signed a petition essentially stating the U.S. government should reject the global warming agreement signed in Kyoto in 1997 and any other similar proposals. They further state there's no convincing scientific evidence that human generated CO2, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.

How and why would so many scientists come together on any issue? They believe one of the three most important molecular substances that make life possible - atmospheric carbon dioxide (the other two being oxygen and water) - is denigrated as an atmospheric "pollutant" in a widely circulated movie. The search for truth is the essence of science. When science is misrepresented, scientists are naturally incensed.

In fact, these scientists believe there is substantial evidence that increases in atmospheric CO2 produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.

Don't take my word for it, check out www.petition project.org and see the data, the analysis, the conclusions and the credentials of this vast group of scientists ... and, as Creegan suggests, make up your own mind

Steve Betros,

Fort Collins

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

The EPA's long-overdue climate change ruling

The Environmental Protection Agency released a historic finding Monday that greenhouse gases are endangering public health and welfare. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista), an outspoken critic of the theory of climate change and of congressional attempts to cut carbon, responded by issuing a statement headlined, "Why the Rush? What's to Hide?"

We have a different question for the EPA: Why has it taken so long?

In 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that greenhouse gases were pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act, and it directed the EPA to determine whether they represented a health threat that would require federal regulation. Thus began more than a year and a half of foot-dragging by the Bush administration, which had reams of data pointing out the clear dangers of climate change but refused to take action. The EPA is hardly rushing to judgment by finally obeying the law and acknowledging the overwhelming worldwide consensus that carbon-fueled climate change threatens human health. Global warming is expected to cause deaths related to adverse temperatures, greater incidence of disease, worsened air quality, rising sea levels, more intense weather events and food and water shortages, among other things. These are not the conclusions of a handful of conspiracy-minded scientists at a British university, as climate skeptics would have people believe; the EPA's finding was based primarily on the work of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Research Council.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Copenhagen climate summit: the climate sceptic's Q&A

How can scientists claim to predict climate change over 50 or more years when they can’t even get next week’s weather forecast right?

They can’t tell us in detail. But forecasting climate change is more like forecasting the seasons than the weather. We know winters are cold and summers are warm. Always. And it’s like that with greenhouse gases. Physicists have known for 200 years that gases like carbon dioxide trap heat. These gases are accumulating in the atmosphere, thanks to our pollution. They will heat up the atmosphere just as certainly as the summer sun heats us.

But surely it’s the job of scientists to deal in irrefutable evidence rather than predictions?

Nothing is absolutely certain or irrefutable. We could be hit tomorrow by an asteroid or a mega-volcano that wipes out warming for centuries. But I’d say climate science is a good deal more reliable than most economic predictions, because it is based on natural laws rather than how markets behave.

Anyway, how can they be sure that the earth has warmed in the last few centuries?

It hasn’t. Evidence from tree rings, the pollen in the bottom of lakes, gas bubbles in ice cores and a lot else, all suggests strongly that it was warm 800 or 900 years ago; then cooler during the little ice age; then warmer again in the 19th century. All this was due to explainable natural cycles. But during the second half of the 20th century there was fast global warming for which there are no known natural explanations. Only the known physics of our soaring emissions of greenhouses gases can explain events.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

WWF welcomes US EPA finding on greenhouse gases

Copenhagen, Denmark – The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and welfare, setting the stage for regulation of global warming pollution under the Clean Air Act.

“This is great news and shows that the Administration is committed to enforcing the Clean Air Act and addressing dangerous climate change," said Keya Chatterjee, Director of WWF-US’s Climate Change Program.

The finding recognizes the clear scientific basis for regulating carbon pollution as a threat to public health and welfare and clears the way for the EPA to require remedial moves by large scale carbon emitters and industries.

Under the former Bush administration, the EPA resisted such a finding during continuous court battles with community and environmental groups seeking toughening of notoriously lax vehicle emissions standards. Ultimately, the US Supreme Court narrowed the EPA's choices with an April 2007 ruling that it should either regulate carbon emissions as a pollutant or come up with a convincing explanation of why it wouldn't..

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Global warming maps: A glimpse into the future

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Tufts Daily - Copenhagen’s climate conundrum

The talks that began yesterday in Copenhagen have been heralded by many around the world as a defining moment in the huge debate over climate change. These high expectations may soon be crushed as leaders at the conference are becoming increasingly pessimistic as to their ability to reach an agreement.

The evidence of climate change is everywhere, from rising sea levels to melting glaciers to increasing temperatures right here at Tufts. On Dec. 3 the people of Boston warmed themselves in record−high temperatures that reached 69 degrees. The warm spell was brief, followed within 48 hours by a winter storm that dumped between three and five inches of snow on the city. The timing of the weather swings provided the perfect backdrop for a conference on climate change.

“Copenhagen is upon us, or we are upon it,” said Professor William Moomaw, director of the Center for International Environment and Resource Policy at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and the energy and climate director of the Tufts Institute of the Environment.

The inflated optimism surrounding the summit was due in large part to the election of President Obama. Countries around the world that had been disheartened by the United States’ refusal to accept the Kyoto Protocol’s carbon emissions guidelines hoped that Obama would change direction.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Climate chief dismisses e-mail outrage

One of the world's leading authorities on climate change has dismissed the contents of controversial e-mails leaked from the University of East Anglia as nothing more than friends and colleagues "letting off steam."

"Well, I can tell you, privately when I talk to my friends, I use language much worse than that. This was purely private communications between friends, between, colleagues, they were letting off steam. I think we should see it as nothing more than that," Rajendra Pachauri, the Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) told CNN.

In late November, a substantial file including more than 1,000 e-mails either sent from or to members of the University's Climatic Research Unit (CRU) in eastern England were allegedly hacked and leaked on the Internet.

They contained language seized upon by climate skeptics who say they offer evidence that scientists have manipulated climate data to exaggerate the threat of global warming.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

British data shows global warming over 150 years

Britain on Tuesday released data from hundreds of monitoring stations worldwide showing that the global surface temperature has risen significantly over the last 150 years.

The statistics are being made public as countries from around the world are locked in UN climate change talks in Copenhagen which could lead to a new deal to cut emissions blamed for global warming.

Perhaps the most striking finding is that the rise in global surface temperature has averaged more than 0.15 degrees Celsius per decade since the middle of the 1970s.

Britain's Met Office released millions of records from over 1,500 of 5,000 stations worldwide which monitor land surface temperatures.

The records, which it has only just received permission to release, date back to 1850 and the Met Office eventually hopes to publish all 5,000.

"Global average temperature has increased over the past century and this warming has been particularly rapid since the 1970s," said the Met Office climate scientist Peter Stott, commenting on the findings.

The data is a subset of the so-called HadCRUT record which is used by top UN body the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC).

The Met Office works alongside two centres in the US to calculate monthly global temperature averages -- the Goddard Institute for Space Studies, which is part of NASA, and the National Climatic Data Center.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

This Decade Is Warmest on Record, 2009 Ranks Fifth (Update1)

Dec. 8 (Bloomberg) -- This decade is set to be the warmest on record though 2009 won’t be the hottest year, meteorologists said today, lending fuel to both skeptics and supporters of a global warming agreement being negotiated in Copenhagen.

Data from the U.K. Met Office and the United Nations’ World Meteorological Organization show this year will be the fifth- warmest. The global average temperature was 0.44 degrees Celsius above the 1961 through 1990 average temperature of 14 degrees (57 degrees Fahrenheit), the WMO said in the Danish capital.

“This tells us that global warming is still rising,” Vicky Pope, head of climate change advice at the Met Office, said in a telephone interview in Copenhagen, where two weeks of United Nations talks began yesterday to draft a climate deal. “Greenhouse gases continue to increase, and it’s clearly important we reach an agreement in Copenhagen to reduce them.”

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Climate Change: EU, China, G77 Trade Words

The wide differences between developed and developing countries yesterday threatened the ongoing negotiations at the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the United Nations Framework Climate Change Convention (UNFCCC) in Copenhagen, Denmark as the European Union (EU) and China as well as Group 77 trade words over responsibility.
This is coming even as  French and Brazilian governments have indicated their common interest in the framework that includes financial support for developing nations in Africa vis-a-vis climate change. According to them, “We are ready to work with the Nigerian authorities in order to get a fair and ambitious agreement in Copenhagen.”
A joint statement signed by both governments through their Embassies in Abuja and made available to THISDAY, said that the two countries recognise that climate change is an imperative “that must be fully compatible with sustainable economic growth and the fight against poverty.”
The EU earlier yesterday accused developing countries of not doing enough to
justify new climate treaty, proposing that countries like China and India whichare more advanced than other developing nations, should partly share the climate change adaptation and mitigation financial burden in developing countries.
While admitting that developing countries need 100 billion euro annually for climate change adaptation by 2020, the EU challenged China and India to share the international public financing of 22-50 billion euro a year with developed c ountries. The commission explained that it would contribute between 2 to 15 euro, adding that the rest should come from domestic sources and carbon markets in developing countries.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

China and the EU Collaborate on Carbon Capture and Storage

Last week, China and the European Union signed a memorandum of understanding to collaborate on a carbon capture and storage (CCS) project in China, according to SciDevNet. CCS involves taking carbon dioxide from industrial smokestacks and storing it in deep geological formations, like empty reservoirs and saline aquifers.

The Near Zero Emission Coal Project (NZEC) will take place in either the Daqing and Jilin oilfields and saline aquifers of the Songliao Basisn or the oilfields of the Jiangsu Depression in the Subei Basin, and is scheduled to be completed by 2015. Representatives of the two parties agreed on the specific at the 12th EU–China summit in Nanjing, and the European Commission pledged up to $86 million to the project.

China's interest in undertaking serious CCS efforts is a response to encouragement from US Secretary of Energy Steven Chu and to two reports published this autumn that point out China's ability to store massive amounts of carbon dioxide — 3,000 gigatonnes — in saline aquifers, which is ten times as much as was previously thought. Additionally, over 80 percent of China's carbon dioxide is emitted within 50 miles of a possible storage area.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Global warming plagues Australia's Outback

Australia's Lake Hume, a man-made body of water near Albury used for irrigation, has been devastated by drought. Eucalyptus tree trunks that were once covered by lake waters now dot the lakebed.

Linda Davidson-The Washington Post

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Human role in climate change not in doubt: U.N.'s Ban | Reuters

"Nothing that has come out in the public as a result of the recent email hackings has cast doubt on the basic scientific message on climate change and that message is quite clear -- that climate change is happening much, much faster than we realized and we human beings are the primary cause," he said.

Ban was reacting to a row over leaked emails from Britain's University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit, which showed some scientists' efforts to boost the credibility of climate change at the expense of skeptics.

Speaking about U.N. climate talks in Denmark that began on Monday, Ban said he expected the meeting would be successful, despite widespread expectations it will fail to yield a legally binding agreement on global targets for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

"I am encouraged and I am optimistic," he told reporters. "I expect a robust agreement at the Copenhagen summit meeting that will be effective immediately and include specific recommendations on mitigation (of the effects of climate change), adaptation, finance and technology."

"This agreement will have an immediate operational effect, as soon as it is agreed," he added.

A key sticking point in the talks is the debate over providing financial aid to poor and developing nations to help them make their economies environmentally friendly and withstand the impacts of a warming climate.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Monday, December 7, 2009

BBC News - Media mixed on climate change summit

In an unprecedented display of uniformity, 56 newspapers in 45 countries carry the same editorial, urging politicians to forget their differences and work together to forge an agreement.

The politicians in Copenhagen have the power to shape history's judgment on this generation: one that saw a challenge and rose to it, or one so stupid that we saw calamity coming but did nothing to avert it. We implore them to make the right choice.


An editorial in the UK's Times newspaper recognises that a legally binding agreement will not be reached in Copenhagen but a commitment can be made, provided rich countries cut the right deal with poorer ones:

But Copenhagen needs to provide a deal that permits the developing world its ascent to prosperity. The main risk to success is that the developing world rejects the deal or that the mutual suspicion between the United States and China on the verification procedures scuppers the plan.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Saturday, December 5, 2009

8 Extreme Solutions to Global Warming

1. Spray It Away

The Idea: Remember how we all had to stop spraying ozone-depleting aerosols into the atmosphere? Maybe it's time to re-think that.

A proposal known as stratospheric aerosol insertion suggests that chemicals — sulfur dioxide, in this case — sprayed into the Earth's nearest atmospheric levels could bind with other chemicals to reflect sunlight from the Earth. Helium balloons or high-flying planes could disperse the sulfur dioxide. The gas would oxidize and reflect back some (but not all) of the sunlight that would otherwise hit the planet's surface. Less sunlight hitting the surface means a cooler earth.

The sulfur would be cheap; it's a common industrial pollutant. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, one kilogram of the stuff could offset the effect of hundreds of thousands of kilograms of carbon dioxide.

Potential Problems: It could end up working too well, causing catastrophic weather changes in certain areas (such as sudden droughts). One scientist proposed trying it over the Arctic first, just in case things got a little too chilly.

Posted via web from Global Warming News

Scientists may re-examine temperature data to prove climate change

A number of climate models, based on information from weather stations around the globe, show the world has been warming gradually since the 1850s.

But the figures have been called into question following the ‘climategate’ affair at the University of East Anglia.

Sceptics alleged that emails stolen from the Climatic Research Unit at the university show scientists were willing to manipulate data to show global warming.

They also complain that the raw data for the climate models was not made available to the public.

To try to restore public confidence the Met Office is talking to other meteorological organisations around the world about recreating the model using the same raw data but more modern computers.

Posted via web from Global Warming News